The Nuremberg Trials

Hermann Göring on trial at Nuremberg 1946. Photo credit: United States Army Signal Corps photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Google Search Labs AI Overview

June 29, 2025

The Nuremberg Trials were a series of military tribunals, held by the Allied forces after World War II, to prosecute prominent members of the political, military, and economic leadership of Nazi Germany.

The trials focused on war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes against peace. The most prominent trial, known as the International Military Tribunal (IMT), took place from 1945 to 1946 in Nuremberg, Germany. [1, 2, 3]

Key Aspects of the Nuremberg Trials:

• Purpose: To hold Nazi leaders accountable for their actions during World War II, particularly the systematic persecution and murder of millions, and the waging of aggressive war. [1, 2, 4, 5, 6]
• Participants: The IMT included judges and prosecutors from the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union. [1, 7, 8]
• Charges: The trials addressed three main categories of offenses: crimes against peace (planning and waging aggressive war), war crimes (violations of the laws of war, including mistreatment of civilians and POWs), and crimes against humanity (murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and persecution). [1, 9, 10]
• Location: Nuremberg, Germany, was chosen as the location due to its relatively undamaged Palace of Justice and its symbolic significance as the site of Nazi rallies. [9]
• Significance: The Nuremberg Trials were groundbreaking in establishing the principle that individuals, even those in high positions of power, can be held accountable for international crimes. They also laid the foundation for the development of international criminal law. [7, 11]
• Subsequent Trials: While the IMT is the most well-known, there were also subsequent trials held in Nuremberg and other locations, addressing a wider range of individuals and crimes. [11, 12, 13, 14]
• Legacy: The Nuremberg Trials continue to be studied and debated, with discussions focusing on their legal framework, the fairness of the proceedings, and their impact on international law and human rights. [15, 16, 17, 18, 19]