The core argument of last week’s post centered on the possibility of building a better future by deliberate planning, and many of the comments and critiques took issue with my suggestion that this is not only impossible but counterproductive. While most of these latter noted that they were participants in the Transition Town movement, the ideas they expressed in that context are anything but unique to that movement; rather, it expresses a consensus that extends through most of the peak oil scene, and indeed, most of contemporary society. Despite its popularity, though, this confidence in our ability to plan the future seems woefully misplaced to me, and the reasons that have forced me to dissent from the consensus may be worth discussing here.
Trying to plan a way out of the crisis of industrial society is an old habit. Back in the 1970s, when the challenge posed by the limits to growth was first showing up on the radar screens of our collective discourse, a great deal of discussion centered on how global planning could back humanity away from the brink; since then, similar plans on various scales -- local, regional, national, global -- have appeared at regular intervals. The durable Lester Brown, to name only one of these would-be planners, released the original version of his Plan B in 2003; he’s now on version 3.0, and further versions will no doubt be forthcoming in due time.
A double helping of irony surrounds all this flurry of planning. If the crisis we face could be met by making plans, we’d have little to worry about; the difficulty is that making plans is the easy part. Go digging in the archives of most American municipalities and you’ll find an energy plan drafted and adopted, after extensive citizen input, in the 1970s, calling for exactly the changes that would have made matters today much less dire: conservation standards, public transit projects, zoning changes to reduce the need for cars, and so on. You’ll have to brush a quarter inch of dust off the plan to read it, though, since nobody has looked at it since the Reagan years, and not one of its recommendations was still functioning when the housing boom began in the early 1990s. A certain skepticism toward another round of plans may thus be in order.
Latest Stories
Electronic Frontier Foundation
- EFF Asks Oregon Supreme Court Not to Limit Fourth Amendment Rights Based on Terms of Service March 27, 2024
- Meta Oversight Board’s Latest Policy Opinion a Step in the Right Direction March 26, 2024
- Speaking Freely: Robert Ssempala March 26, 2024
- Podcast Episode: About Face (Recognition) March 26, 2024
The Intercept
- Pro-Israel Advocates Are Weaponizing “Safety” on College Campuses March 28, 2024
- Kamala Harris Touts Secret Service Program Encouraging High School Spying March 28, 2024
- Pentagon Ignores Law Calling for Report on How It Trained So Many African Coup Leaders March 28, 2024
- Anti-Abortion Doctors Struggle to Explain Mifepristone Harms Before Supreme Court March 27, 2024
VTDigger
- House signals support for Act 250 overhaul, while Gov. Phil Scott says it misses the mark March 28, 2024
- Survey shows vaping rate doubled in Vermont, while cigarette use declined March 28, 2024
- Evan Carlson: Vermont’s fight for repair freedom March 28, 2024
- Prospero B. Gogo Jr: Preventable nicotine-product-related illnesses cost Vermont money and suffering March 28, 2024
Mountain Times -- Central Vermont
- Hartland School Board explains budget before vote, April 2 March 28, 2024
- The Mountain Times – Volume 51, Number 13 – March 27 – April 2, 2024 March 27, 2024
- Weekly Horoscope — March 27 – April 2, 2024 March 27, 2024
- Easter flowers: what’s in your bouquet? March 27, 2024