Philip A. Farruggio -- World News Trust
April 18, 2018
As a columnist, I must get to the point on key events that have shaped our future as a republic.
Let it be known that what I am about to share with you, my readers, are things I cannot prove, yet strongly believe to be true. Sometimes we need to compare the stories told to us by this empire and its minions in the media and political realm with those of the "outside researchers and investigators" that work independently. Having seen and read the many films and books in contradiction of what I call "Fake News from Fake Amerika," this writer sticks to his beliefs, contrary to what many from this empire like to label as Conspiracy theories.
Robert Stinnett wrote his book Day of Deceit (1999) to suggest that the FDR administration knew of the upcoming attack by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor... and allowed it to happen. Stinnett's conclusion, from his extensive research, was that FDR needed to get us into WWII and was facing much opposition here at home. Dusko Popov, a Serbian double agent during the war, wrote his autobiography Spy/Counterspy (1974) whereupon he stated that around March of 1941, he personally met with J Edgar Hoover. At that meeting, he passed along information, obtained by him directly from the German Abwehr, of the planned Japanese attack at one of our Pacific naval bases, most likely Pearl Harbor, set for around the end of the year.
Former New Orleans prosecutor and judge Jim Garrison wrote the 1988 book On the trail of the Assassins, on which Oliver Stone based his 1991 blockbuster film JFK. Both the book and the film make a compelling case that Lee Harvey Oswald was NOT the killer, and may not even have been involved in the conspiracy, except as a setup patsy. Garrison and Stone both felt that JFK's assassination was literally a "coup de' tat" orchestrated by factions deep within our own government. At least 21 witnesses to the assassination turned up dead during the few years afterward. That alone would give anyone pause to consider that the 1964 Warren Commission Report was full of holes.
On Aug. 2, 1964, the destroyer USS Maddox was said to have been attacked by the North Vietnamese. This (so-called) incident gave President Johnson the impetus to urge the Senate to pass the infamous Gulf of Tonkin Resolution that legalized LBJ's plans to get involved in a war there. History and lots of fine investigations have more or less proven that the whole event was faked by our government.
William Pepper wrote the most spellbinding book Orders to Kill: The Truth behind the Murder of Martin Luther King (1995). Pepper researched this case for years and points the finger at various agencies and NOT at James Earl Ray, for the plot and execution of King's murder. The interesting thing about King being murdered in April of '68 was that it was exactly one year after he gave his chilling speech at the Riverside Church, coming out publicly for the first time against the war in Vietnam. He made sure to call our country the "Greatest purveyor of evil."
On top of that, in April of '68 he was in Memphis to offer solidarity to the mostly black Memphis sanitation workers who were on strike. This was a far cry from the MLK who spent most of his activism marching and speaking out for civil rights.
The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy by Dan Moldea has just been re-released for the 50th anniversary of RFK's murder. In the book, Moldea covers lots of details concerning who may have been involved and why. Once again, he, along with countless other investigators, throw out the assertion that Sirhan Sirhan was the gunman. Interesting point here: Before the trial of Sirhan, the government had psychiatrist Dr. Jolyon West examine him. Dr. West had an extensive background working for covert operations spanning back to the Korean War. He had Jack Ruby as a patient after Ruby was imprisoned for killing Lee Harvey Oswald. The real interesting fact is that later on, after the Sirhan case, Dr. West worked in a program run at Vacaville Prison's Medical Facility and had none other than inmate Donald DeFreeze as a patient in some program to treat "violent offenders." DeFreeze , a few years later, became the leader (Field Marshall Cinque) of the obtuse homegrown terrorist group calling itself The Symbionese Liberation Army, which kidnapped Patty Hearst... who Dr. West also treated after her capture/liberation... and, of course, DeFreeze was killed during that event. There have been suggestions by other researchers over the years that DeFreeze was both a police informant AND agent provocateur.
In the Spring of 1990 Saddam Hussein of Iraq was angry with Kuwait for basically two major reasons: A) He had to borrow money from them for his decade-long war with Iran, and felt they should erase his country's debt because Iraq did all the fighting and dying; B) Hussein felt that Kuwait was angle drilling( underwater) Iraqi oil in violation of their sovereign right for it. Things got testy and Bush Sr. sent U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie to meet with Hussein... who was, at that time, one of our cherished allies in that region.
Transcript of Meeting Between Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie -- July 25, 1990 (Eight days before the Aug. 2, 1990, Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait)
July 25, 1990 -- Presidential Palace -- Baghdad
U.S. Ambassador Glaspie: I have direct instructions from President Bush to improve our relations with Iraq. We have considerable sympathy for your quest for higher oil prices, the immediate cause of your confrontation with Kuwait. (pause) As you know, I lived here for years and admire your extraordinary efforts to rebuild your country. We know you need funds. We understand that, and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country. (pause) We can see that you have deployed massive numbers of troops in the south. Normally that would be none of our business, but when this happens in the context of your threat s against Kuwait, then it would be reasonable for us to be concerned. For this reason, I have received an instruction to ask you, in the spirit of friendship -- not confrontation -- regarding your intentions: Why are your troops massed so very close to Kuwait's borders?
Saddam Hussein: As you know, for years now I have made every effort to reach a settlement on our dispute with Kuwait. There is to be a meeting in two days; I am prepared to give negotiations only this one more brief chance. (pause) When we (the Iraqis) meet (with the Kuwaitis) and we see there is hope, then nothing will happen. But if we are unable to find a solution, then it will be natural that Iraq will not accept death.
U.S. Ambassador Glaspie: What solutions would be acceptable?
Saddam Hussein: If we could keep the whole of the Shatt al Arab -- our strategic goal in our war with Iran -- we will make concessions (to the Kuwaitis). But, if we are forced to choose between keeping half of the Shatt and the whole of Iraq (i.e., in Saddam s view, including Kuwait) then we will give up all of the Shatt to defend our claims on Kuwait to keep the whole of Iraq in the shape we wish it to be. (pause) What is the United States' opinion on this?
U.S. Ambassador Glaspie: We have no opinion on your Arab -- Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary (of State James) Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960's, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America. (Saddam smiles)
Hussein attacked and occupied Kuwait and became Public Enemy #1 to the USA. Bush Sr. referred to him as another Hitler, and you know the rest.
A mere 10 years later, in September of 2001, the Twin Towers were taken down like pancakes and this set off our never-ending" War on Terror. David Ray Griffin, in 2008 wrote 9/11 The New Pearl Harbor, his investigation into what really may have gone down that tragic day... and the why along with the how of it. Once again, his book refutes the findings of the 9/11 Commission Report that it was a small band of terrorists, lead by Osama bin Laden , that did the heinous act on their own... without any aid from other covert agencies (of our government?).
In the aftermath of the 9/11 horror, many sources have shown that the Bush/Cheney cabal always had their sites on Iraq. In July of 2002, the inner circle of the British government met to discuss the Iraq situation. This is directly from Wikipedia :
The most controversial paragraph is a report of a recent visit to Washington by the head of the Secret Intelligence Service Sir Richard Dearlove (known in official terminology as 'C'):
C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.
The British analysis of U.S. policy is also stated elsewhere in the minutes:
The Defence Secretary said that the United States had already begun "spikes of activity" to put pressure on the regime. No decisions had been taken, but he thought the most likely timing in U.S. minds for military action to begin was January, with the timeline beginning 30 days before the U.S. Congressional elections.
The Foreign Secretary said he would discuss this with Colin Powell this week. It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.
We all know what transpired afterwards, as the country that we true patriots love, along with our British stooges, had committed a most heinous action, worse than even the Vietnam debacle. The "Fake News" empire was working on steroids... and it still is with our illegal and immoral dabbling in other Middle Eastern affairs. Isn't it time for the majority of our fellow citizens to stop believing in the lies and disinformation that passes as truthful news?