I found the New Yorker article "The Dystopians," by Ben McGrath, to
be an appallingly white male extravaganza.
Carolyn Baker -- Speaking Truth To Power
Jan. 25, 2009 -- This past week the New Yorker published "The Dystopians"
by Ben McGrath, by whom I was interviewed back in October, and who
allowed me to make an appearance in the article with a brief mention of
my forthcoming book.
Sitting with this piece for the past seven days
has been unsettling, not because I personally wanted more air time, but
because of the article's paucity of references to the female
perspective regarding the collapse of civilization. Although I greatly
admire Dmitry Orlov and James Howard Kunstler, and while I feel
camaraderie in particular with my friends in the Vermont Independence
movement, Rob Williams and Thomas Naylor, I found "The Dystopians" to
be an appallingly white male extravaganza.
The only other "dystopian" female
referred to in the piece is Chellis Glendinning, psychologist and
author from New Mexico and renowned speaker at the November, 2008 Vermont Independence Convention. Additionally, Sharon Astyk, who resides not far from Kunstler, author of Depletion and Abundance and her forthcoming A Nation of Farmers: Defeating the Food Crisis on American Soil, and who was recently interviewed in the New York Times, as well as Kathy McMahon, psychotherapist and manager of Peak Oil Blues, were ignored in McGrath's piece.
My complaint is not about some
notion of "equal time" but rather the consequences of omitting a
uniquely female perspective from the discourse about collapse and the
construction of a new paradigm of life on the planet. Despite my
caveat, I know I will be accused of proclaiming the superiority of the
female gender, but that is absolutely not my intent. In fact, quite the
opposite. The conversation requires the distinct characteristics of
both genders, and without it, only half the landscape of collapse can
be viewed.
First, the very word "dystopian" is inaccurate. The dictionary describes "dystopian" as "a
society characterized by human misery, as squalor, oppression, disease,
and overcrowding." I do not limit the collapse of civilization to this
particular scenario. "Dystopian" also suggests the opposite of "utopia"
which is an ideal place or state that is a vision of social perfection.
What McGrath fails to fulfill in his report is a thoughtful exploration
of the very nature of collapse-its origins, its essence, and its
possible outcomes. Instead, the focus is on an implied eccentric Orlov
who lives on a boat and Kunstler's quirky ways with other human beings.
"Dystopian" is indeed a characteristically male term, assuming an
either/or, polarizing approach, rather than a more inclusive outlook.
Many years
ago I embraced the sensible and insightful gender perspective of the
psychologist, Carl Jung, who argued that both genders contain qualities
of the opposite gender, and that those qualities have both
life-supporting and life-destroying aspects. Therefore, in Jungian
fashion, collapse must be understood and explored from the perspectives
of both genders. The typically male perspective would in the case of
Peak Oil, emphasize things like facts, statistics, pipelines,
percentage of supply, demand, and long-term consequences. It would
instruct us, warn us, and suggest various courses of action.
From the
female perspective, these concerns are in no way irrelevant or
unimportant, but may motivate us to embrace an even larger perspective.
By "larger" I do not mean more global but rather, a perspective that
includes the body and emotions as well as the intellect. It isn't just
about having a womb and the capacity to give birth. However, a woman's
fundamental, bone-marrow connection to life and generativity is
uniquely female. Perhaps this is the reason that in many indigenous
societies, including the Iroquois Confederacy, the clan mothers'
authority superseded that of the warriors who could not go to war
without their permission.
What this is
about is the pivotal aspect of the female psyche that is relational
rather than combative or problem-solving. The feminine principle in
both women and men asks: How can we connect with each other in a manner
that supports survival and enhances our lives as we navigate the
destructive aspects of collapse? How can we build alliances, join with
neighbors and villages to sustain our families and communities? From
the feminine perspective, the egos of certain "key players" matter much
less than the collective lessons that the unprecedented phenomenon of
collapse may be inviting us to learn.
The feminine principle always
compels us to go deeper and rather than asking "if" the world as we
have known it is really ending, asking instead: What is the essence of
the project of civilization? What makes its continuance axiomatic? What
compelling signals invite us to call it into question? Tom Petruno's
January 24, Los Angeles TimesEconomy In Shock: It's Failure Overload"
opines that our problem is "failure", assuming that the success of
civilization is the most desirable option, without of course, asking
the more profound questions about the nature and consequences of
civilization or whether or not its continuance is preferable to the
alternative. article, "
An empire
constructed on conquest, hierarchy, and competition is inherently
heroic and deems any opposite an abject failure. In its stultifying,
constricted, superficial world view, there is no space or depth which
might expand the conversation and eliminate the need for polarization.
Characteristic of life-destroying male rigidity, civilization marginalizes those who question it without examining its own raison d'être, and
of course, because it cannot include, only dominate, the feminine
perspective is not part of the conversation. This is not to say that
any particular reporter embodies "life-destroying male rigidity".
Journalists in corporate media are parts of systems of empire whose
interests lie in selling newspapers, magazines, and books which have
never been about asking the deeper questions but rather perpetuating
the fantasy that there is nothing more glorious and propitious than
empire.
Chellis
Glendinning, who makes a brief appearance in McGrath's article as I do,
has written two glaringly relevant books regarding collapse: My Name Is Chellis and I'm Recovering From Western Civilization and Off The Map: An Expedition Deep Into Imperialism, The Global Economy, and Other Earthly Whereabouts. Her powerful address to the Vermont Independence Convention at the Statehouse is a must-watch.
In a 2007 interview, "Technology and Its Discontents", Chellis states, "This
idea of ‘turning back the clock' expresses the basic assumption of mass
technological society, which is that going forward is the deal. We
always want to be going forward. It's scary to
go back. But that assumption needs to be challenged. It doesn't matter
what expression we use, whether we talk about going back, going
sideways, going up or down. The important thing is to go back to
wholeness. It's time for human beings to come into a sustainable world."
What leaps out at me here is that word so supremely characteristic of the feminine principle, wholeness.
While males preparing for collapse are certainly supportive of
wholeness, the feminine experience is in itself, one of wholeness. The
female psyche is wholeness, containing the capacity to include,
embrace, and hold a variety of opposites in our bodies and souls. In a
collapsing world, is it not crucial to understand how this outlook is
embodied and expressed in contrast with how males might respond to the
unraveling? Is not the notion of sustainability itself a concept
engendered by the principle of wholeness?
I cannot help
but notice that in an article called "The Dystopians" which implies
that people talking about and preparing for collapse are "doom and
gloomers", the one and only quote from me referred to the exciting
aspects of collapse which have to do with breaking down barriers and
getting beyond labels. This is particularly ironic since I'm often
perceived as a doomer, but perhaps there's something about a female
voice in the discourse that could soften, expand, and temper the sense
of despair which supposedly characterizes the dystopians.
Yet another
aspect of the feminine principle, resilience, is now widely embraced by
individuals and communities consciously preparing for collapse on a
variety of levels. One man who exemplifies integration of the feminine
principle alongside the masculine in terms of wholeness,
sustainability, resilience, and interdependence is Rob Hopkins, author
of The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependence to Local Resilience.
From the experiment of Hopkins and numerous fellow citizens in a small
UK community was birthed this extraordinary handbook for strategizing
how individuals and villages can wisely prepare for powering down and
living sustainably in a post-petroleum world. Curiously, the New Yorker
article contained nothing about the Transition Town movement which is
now sweeping the globe. As I stated in a recent review of the book, I
do not believe that the Transition Town movement is a magic bullet, nor
do I believe that its success is guaranteed. However, I do believe that
it is planting seeds, some of which will invariably come to fruition at
some point during the collapse process. Moreover, speaking for myself,
regardless of the degree of success of the movement, it is, in the
moment, an excellent place to direct one's time and energy
constructively in preparing physically, emotionally, and spiritually
for collapse.
My forthcoming book Sacred Demise: Walking the Spiritual Path of Civilization's Collapse,
will explore in depth the psychology of transition--the emotional and
spiritual aspects of collapse from the vantage point of the feminine
principle while honoring and cherishing the deep, life-supporting
masculine energies that must comprise the new paradigm that is now
erupting out of the ashes of empire. Please stay tuned to the Truth to Power website for further details.
***
Carolyn Baker
Speaking Truth To Power is a
website owned and managed by Carolyn Baker. Carolyn is an adjunct
professor of history, a former psychotherapist, an author, and a
student of mythology and ritual. This website offers up-to-the-moment
alternative reporting of U.S. and international news, articles
containing information and opinion, and a venue of support and
connection for awake individuals who want not only to be informed, but
to organize their lives and communities in ways that most effectively
assist them in navigating what current events are manifesting.
Carolyn’s Mission: “The Chinese proverb and curse says, ‘May you live
in interesting times’.” In the first decade of the twenty-first
century, we live in profound uncertainty, faced with issues
unprecedented in the history of the human race. Truth To Power seeks to
provide readers with a ‘fixed point in a changing universe’ that both
informs and supports humanity’s efforts to remake the world—both our
personal worlds and our planet. My intention is to offer a beacon of
light in the smothering darkness with which we seem to be engulfed,
making available information and specific ideas and strategies which we
all might utilize as we experience the life/death/rebirth process
inherent in the inner and outer realms of our current reality.”
Click here to subscribe to Truth to Power’s daily news stories update.