Mickey Z. -- World News Trust
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." --Antonio Gramsci
Throughout my time with Occupy Wall Street, I’ve encountered the FAQ (e.g. What are your demands? Who are your leaders? Why don’t you get a job?). However, enduring a predictable litany of questions is nothing new to anyone involved with radical activism. To follow are some of my favorites from over the years -- along with my answers.
FAQ: Why are you attacking me for my way of life?
MZ: That’s easy: Our way of life is really a "way of death" and is directly responsible for the current global crises I write and speak about. We also might want to agree to save the word "attack" for, say, those living under the U.S. taxpayer-funded predator drones, cruise missiles, and depleted uranium shells. Let's save it for countless victims of child abuse. Let's save "attack" to describe the reality of one rape every 46 seconds in America. Deal?
FAQ: Why do you hate America?
MZ: What does even mean? Do I despise baseball? Do I say nasty things about abstract expressionism or hip-hop or jazz? Do I hold a grudge against the Grand Canyon or the Mississippi River?
For the record, I don’t "hate America." In fact, I think it’s one of the best countries anyone ever stole. (insert rimshot here) But, if by “America,” you mean the elected/appointed officials and the corporations that fund them, well, I guess I do hate that America -- with justification.
FAQ: So, why don’t you just leave?
MZ: Leave America? And potentially end up on the other end of U.S. foreign policy? No thanks.
FAQ: Where are your step-by-step solutions?
MZ: Way too many people imply that unless a critic expounds a specific strategy for change, his/her opinion is worthless. This reaction misses the essential role critical analysis plays in a society where problems -- and their causes -- are so cleverly disguised. When discussing the future, the first step is often an identification and demystification of the past and present.
Besides, what value would my "solutions" hold while we are still in the midst of myriad global crises? I like to imagine that if we began detaching ourselves from a system designed to destroy us (and all life) and began dismantling that system, we'd create a space in which we could recognize paths and options currently invisible to us.
(That said, I often do make very specific activist suggestions in my articles.)
FAQ: Why must you always focus on the negative?
MZ: Becoming an activist can be an incredibly positive experience: creating community, inspiring change, feeling empowered. While most humans choose instead to use their meager time chasing money, collecting possessions, and obsessing over pop culture, the activist sees a bigger picture, a longer view, a deeper connection. However, being an effective activist also requires us to tear off the blinders and become acutely aware of how our way of life has devastated the planet.
Call that “negative” if you must but I’ll counter with: What does the term "negative" mean in this context anyway?
If you went to see a doctor, would you deem him/her negative for talking about your high cholesterol levels instead of, say, your excellent fingernail health?
If you brought your car in for a tune-up, do you want the mechanic to compliment you for keeping your tire pressure at the right level but stay away from a negative topic like defective brakes?
Of course not...
Why then do so many humans shut down when confronted with the realities of our current social, economic, and environmental crises? Why is analysis that presents a dose of reality smugly dismissed as "negative"? Don’t you want to know what's going on and how you can help address it beyond minor lifestyle changes and the petty conflicts of party politics? Why not save your knee-jerk "negative" retort for those who directly or indirectly support the corporate-sponsored rape of our planet?
Mic Check: It's not "negativity" that's the issue here, folks. It's denial.
FAQ: Why aren't you marching in lockstep with me? You suck.
MZ: Of course, no one phrases this question quite so bluntly but it's astonishing to me how often a fellow human can be virtually in synch with my perception/lifestyle/worldview but choose instead to angrily dwell upon the few issues on which we differ. Purity is not a realistic or productive goal. Choose process instead.
FAQ: Since you seem to think you have all the answers, exactly what should we do?
MZ: This is the most disingenuous FAQ of all. You know exactly what needs to be done. If you walked into a room and saw a man attacking someone you loved, would you ask me what you should do? Would you write a letter to Congress, sign a petition, hold a candlelight vigil, create a Facebook page, vote for a Democrat, chant, pray, or blame patriarchy... or would you get busy beating the attacker's ass from one end of the room to the other?
P.S. I definitely do not think I have all the answers... but I sometimes feel I have more questions than most.
FAQ: Where do you derive your hope?
MZ: I’m not sure “hope” is the best word for it but please allow me to repeat the Antonio Gramsci quote with which I opened: "I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will."
I can think of no better mantra for activism. Don't shy away from learning the ugly realities of industrial civilization but never let these brutal truths prevent you from taking urgent action and believing you can create change and save lives -- human and non-human lives. It's a delicate balance but our ability to walk this fine line could literally make all the difference in the world.
We need a planet brimming with pessimistic optimists. Join us...
© WorldNewsTrust.com -- Share and re-post this story. Please include this copyright notice and a link to World News Trust.