Latest Stories
Electronic Frontier Foundation
-
In Landmark Battle Over Free Speech, EFF Urges Supreme Court to Strike Down Texas and Florida Laws that Let States Dictate What Speech Social Media Sites Must Publish
December 07, 2023
-
Think Twice Before Giving Surveillance for the Holidays
December 07, 2023
-
EFF Reminds the Supreme Court That Copyright Trolls Are Still a Problem
December 07, 2023
-
Meta Announces End-to-End Encryption by Default in Messenger
December 07, 2023
The Intercept
-
Julian Assange Could Face Extradition to the U.S. by Early 2024
December 07, 2023
-
DeSantis Lawyer Can’t Name a Single Policy That Led to Reform Prosecutor’s Suspension
December 06, 2023
-
Centrist Ohio Democrat Quietly Removes Name From Letter Calling for Gaza Ceasefire
December 06, 2023
-
As U.S.-Funded Wars Rage in Israel and Ukraine, Pentagon Watchdog Warns of Military Failures
December 06, 2023
VTDigger
-
With Honoree Fleming’s killer still at large, community rallies to raise reward money
December 07, 2023
-
Corrections department asks judge to consider home detention for ailing 80-year-old double murder suspect
December 07, 2023
-
JetBlue CEO meets with Vermont delegation, may reinstate popular Burlington-JFK route
December 07, 2023
-
Vermont reports post-Thanksgiving Covid outbreaks in schools and long-term care facilities
December 07, 2023
Mountain Times -- Central Vermont
-
Mountain Times – Dec. 6-12, 2023
December 07, 2023
-
It shouldn’t have snowed
December 06, 2023
-
Senior Scene: Reflecting on the holiday season
December 06, 2023
-
Living the Dream: What’s in your car?
December 06, 2023
What explains this outburst of panic among a certain cohort of elites? Control and regulation are obviously at the center of the story, but whose?
During the proposed half-year pause when humanity can take stock of the risks, who will stand for humanity? Since AI labs in China, India, and Russia will continue their work (perhaps in secret), a global public debate on the issue is inconceivable.
Still, we should consider what is at stake, here. In his 2015 book, Homo Deus, the historian Yuval Harari predicted that the most likely outcome of AI would be a radical division -- much stronger than the class divide -- within human society. Soon enough, biotechnology and computer algorithms will join their powers in producing “bodies, brains, and minds,” resulting in a widening gap “between those who know how to engineer bodies and brains and those who do not.”
In such a world, “those who ride the train of progress will acquire divine abilities of creation and destruction, while those left behind will face extinction.”
(more)
READ MORE: Project Syndicate