Trade Secrets | George Monbiot
Why will no one answer the obvious, massive question about TTIP?
Jan. 13, 2015 (Monbiot.com) -- When a government proposes to abandon one of the fundamental principles of justice, there had better be a powerful reason. Equality before the law is not ditched lightly. Surely? Well read this and judge for yourself.
The UK government, like that of the United States and 13 other EU members(1), wants to set up a separate judicial system, exclusively for the use of corporations. While the rest of us must take our chances in the courts, corporations across the EU and United States will be allowed to sue governments before a tribunal of corporate lawyers. They will be able to challenge the laws they don’t like, and seek massive compensation if these are deemed to affect their “future anticipated profits.”
I’m talking about the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and its provisions for “investor state dispute settlement.” If this sounds incomprehensible, that’s mission accomplished: public understanding is lethal to this attempted corporate coup.
The TTIP is widely described as a trade agreement. But while in the past trade agreements sought to address protectionism, now they seek to address protection(2). In other words, once they promoted free trade by removing trade taxes (tariffs), now they promote the interests of transnational capital by downgrading the defence of human health, the natural world, labour rights and the poor and vulnerable from predatory corporate practices.
The proposed treaty has been described by the eminent professor of governance Colin Crouch as “post-democracy in its purest form.”(3) Post-democracy refers to our neutron bomb politics, in which the old structures, such as elections and parliaments, remain standing, but are uninhabited by political power. Power has shifted to other forums, unamenable to public challenge: “small, private circles where political elites do deals with corporate lobbies.”
Investor-state dispute settlement means allowing corporations to sue governments over laws which might affect their profits. The tobacco company Philip Morris is currently suing Australia and Uruguay(4), under similar treaties, for their attempts to discourage smoking. It describes the UK’s proposed rules on plain packaging as “unlawful”(5): if TTIP goes ahead, expect a challenge.
Corporations, like natural persons, can use the courts to defend their interests. But, under current treaties, investor-state dispute settlement lets them apply instead to offshore tribunals operating in secret, without such basic safeguards as third-party standing, judicial review and rights of appeal. As Colin Crouch notes, this is not just post-democracy, but “post-law.”(6)
On Wednesday, the TTIP is debated in the House of Commons. Next month negotiations resume between the United States and the EU. So you’d have imagined that our government might, by now, have sought to justify it.
There is only one possible justification for a separate judicial system: a failure by the existing courts fairly to arbitrate the legal claims that businesses make. So which judicial systems in the United States or the EU discriminate unfairly against corporations?
I have asked this question (via Twitter) to the business secretary Vince Cable, his deputy, Lord Livingstone and the Conservative leader in the European Parliament, Syed Kamall. Resounding silence. I have asked it in this column, three times(7,8,9). Nothing. I have asked the business department by phone. After an attempt by its spokesperson to suggest that there could be something wrong with the U.S. system, and a subsequent failure to explain what this might be, he sent me this statement: “Investor protection is needed as domestic courts are not the typical route for investors to seek redress”(10). Not the typical route? That’s it?
In the House of Commons, Zac Goldsmith MP asked the business minister to name the occasions in the past five years in which companies in the EU or United States have been discriminated against in courts across the Atlantic. Answer: the government “does not have access to relevant information.”(11)
The European Commission argues that “the main reason for having an ISDS mechanism is because in many countries investment agreements are not directly enforceable in domestic courts.”(12) Perhaps. But none of those countries are in the proposed trading bloc. A condition of EU membership is “an independent and efficient judiciary” with “legal guarantees for fair trial procedures”(13). What is a provision designed to protect investors in failed states doing in a treaty between the EU and the United States?
David Cameron has attempted a different argument. At the G20 summit last year, he said “we’ve signed trade deal after trade deal and there has never been a problem in the past.”(14) It’s the dangerous driver defence: I’ve done 100mph loads of times, and I’m still alive, aren’t I?
Yes, we’ve been lucky so far; luckier than other nations in Europe, which so far have been sued 127 times under investor-state clauses in other treaties(15). The Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland have had to pay out enough money to have employed 380,000 nurses for a year(16). Investor-state cases are escalating rapidly(17): as corporations begin to understand the power they’ve been granted, they will turn their attention from the weak nations to the strong ones.
No one will provide a justification because no one can. To protect transnational capital from a non-existent risk, our governments are recklessly abandoning the principle of equality before the law.
I believe that we can win this. We have won it before, when the treaty they now call TTIP was the Multilateral Agreement on Investment(18,19). After a massive public response it was defeated in 1998. Now they are trying again, with a different name.
Already, two petitions have gathered 2.5 million signatures between them(20,21). In response, the EU has frantically been making concessions. For the first time in its history, it has made its negotiating positions public(22). It has launched a consultation on investor-state dispute settlement (though still, after 6 months, not published the results)(23)*; promised protections for public services(24) and proposed to improve the offshore arbitration system(25) – while still failing to explain what’s wrong with the courts we already possess. These are desperate concessions from an organisation that knows the window is closing: if it can’t secure an agreement before the next U.S. election, TTIP is probably finished.
So keep marching, keep signing, keep joining the campaigns that have come together under the Stop TTIP banner(26). Ask yourself whether, in an age of ecocide, food banks and financial collapse, we need more protection from predatory corporate practices or less. This is a reckless, unjustified destruction of our rights. We can defeat it.
*An hour after I posted this article, the results were published. They show an overwhelming rejection of investor state dispute settlement among the 150,000 people who responded.Surely ISDS must now be struck out?
References:
1. http://blogs.ft.com/brusselsblog/2014/10/23/leaked-letter-14-ministers-take-on-juncker-over-trade/
2. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/28/opinion/krugman-no-big-deal.html
3. http://www.ippr.org/juncture/democracy-at-a-ttiping-point-seizing-a-slim-chance-to-reassert-democratic-sovereignty-in-europe
4. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/big-tobacco-puts-countries-on-trial-as-concerns-over-ttip-deals-mount-9807478.html
5. http://civitas.org.uk/newblog/2014/08/big-tobaccos-11bn-uk-attack-could-send-eu-us-deal-up-in-flames/
6. http://www.ippr.org/juncture/democracy-at-a-ttiping-point-seizing-a-slim-chance-to-reassert-democratic-sovereignty-in-europe
7. http://www.monbiot.com/2013/11/04/a-global-ban-on-left-wing-politics/
8. http://www.monbiot.com/2013/12/02/managing-transparency/
9. http://www.monbiot.com/2014/11/04/a-gunpowder-plot-against-democracy/
10. By email, 12th January 2015.
12. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/151916.htm
13. See Chapter 23: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/policy/conditions-membership/chapters-of-the-acquis/index_en.htm
14. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/david-cameron-press-conference-g20-brisbane-australia
15. https://www.foeeurope.org/hidden-cost-eu-trade-deals
16. https://www.foeeurope.org/hidden-cost-eu-trade-deals
17. http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21623756-governments-are-souring-treaties-protect-foreign-investors-arbitration
18. http://www.monbiot.com/1997/04/15/making-government-redundant/
19. http://www.monbiot.com/1998/08/13/running-on-mmt/
21. https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/eu-ttip-petition#
22. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1230
23. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/consultations/index.cfm?consul_id=179
24. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1115
25. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/151916.htm
26. https://stop-ttip.org/about-the-eci-campaign/
© 2015 George Monbiot
- CreatedSunday, January 18, 2015
- Last modifiedSunday, January 18, 2015
SUBSCRIBE
World Desk Activities
phys.org/news/2024-05-composition-gut-microbiota-d…
Composition of gut microbiota could influence decision-making
The way we make decisions in a social context can be explained by psychological, social, and political factors. But what if other forces were at…
phys.org/news/2024-05-whales.html
Are we really about to talk to whales?
The past decade has seen an explosion of new research into some of the most fascinating sounds in the sea: the vocalizations of whales and…
phys.org/news/2024-05-black-teachers-lost-civil-ri…
How Black teachers lost when civil rights won in Brown v. Board
Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court decision that desegregated public schools, stands in the collective national memory as a turning point in America's…
phys.org/news/2024-05-cancer-drug-pollution-global…
Cancer drug pollution is a growing global concern
As incidence of cancer increases globally, the use of cancer drugs is also growing at a rate of approximately 10 percent per year in developed…
phys.org/news/2024-05-summer-northern-hemisphere-h…
Summer 2023 was northern hemisphere's hottest for 2,000 years, tree rings show
The summer of 2023 was the warmest in the non-tropical areas of the northern hemisphere for 2,000 years, a new study has shown.
phys.org/news/2024-05-blooded-dinosaurs-roamed-ear…
When the first warm-blooded dinosaurs roamed Earth
Scientists once thought of dinosaurs as sluggish, cold-blooded creatures. Then research suggested that some could control their body temperature, but when and how that shift…
phys.org/news/2024-05-pyramids-built-lost-river-sc…
Pyramids built along long-lost river, scientists discover
Scientists have discovered a long-buried branch of the Nile river that once flowed alongside more than 30 pyramids in Egypt, potentially solving the mystery of…
phys.org/news/2024-05-danger-beauty-solar-storms.h…
'Danger behind the beauty': More solar storms could be heading our way
Tourists normally have to pay big money and brave cold climates for a chance to see an aurora, but last weekend many people around the…
techxplore.com/news/2024-05-terminal-diode-wireles…
A promising three-terminal diode for wireless communication and optically driven computing
Two-terminal devices are electronic components connected to electrical circuits via two electrical terminals. Although these components are the key building blocks of most existing devices,…
medicalxpress.com/news/2024-05-covid-vaccinations-…
Repeat COVID-19 vaccinations elicit antibodies that neutralize variants, other viruses
The COVID-19 pandemic is over, but the virus that caused it is still here, sending thousands of people to the hospital each week and spinning…
Latest Stories
Electronic Frontier Foundation
- The Alaska Supreme Court Takes Aerial Surveillance’s Threat to Privacy Seriously, Other Courts Should Too May 29, 2024
- Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Section 230 | EFFector 36.7 May 29, 2024
- A Wider View on TunnelVision and VPN Advice May 29, 2024
- EFF Submission to the Oversight Board on Posts That Include “From the River to the Sea” May 28, 2024
The Intercept
- Leonard Leo Built the Conservative Court. Now He’s Funneling Dark Money Into Law Schools. May 29, 2024
- Sterilization, Murders, Suicides: Bans Haven’t Slowed Abortions, and They’re Costing Lives May 26, 2024
- The Media Still Doesn’t Grasp the Danger of Trump May 25, 2024
- Hundreds of Palestinian Doctors Disappeared Into Israeli Detention May 24, 2024
VTDigger
- Vermont Conversation: Are the kids all right? Vermont high school students speak out May 29, 2024
- In western Vermont, small town residents weigh large scale solar projects May 29, 2024
- ‘Baby Doe’ death investigation closes after four decades with no criminal charges May 29, 2024
- In Vermont Supreme Court case, medical marijuana user says state wrongly denied unemployment benefits May 29, 2024