World Desk Activity
Francis Goodwin shared a video.Friday News Dump -- Dec. 6, 2013 -- World News TrustWorld News Trust and Airlight LLC present Friday News Dump 6 Dec. 2013. Gregory Crawford and Francis Goodwin hosts. Deborah Goodwin camera...2013-12-09 01:11:14
Francis Goodwin shared a video.Gregory Crawford's Weekly Rant! -- Dec. 6, 2013 -- Friday News DumpWorld News Trust and Airlight LLC present Gregory Crawford's Weekly Rant! Dec. 6, 2013. Passionately written and delivered by Gregory Crawford....2013-12-07 20:51:40
Another World Is Possible... Except At Mealtime? | Mickey Z.
July 25, 2013
Mickey Z. -- World News Trust
"There is no way to overstate the magnitude of the collective spiritual transformation that will occur when we shift from food of violent oppression to food of gentleness and compassion."
- Will Tuttle
In a recent article of mine, I posed the following queries to my non-vegan comrades:
What if I told you that I knew a way you could oppose unspeakable animal cruelty, stand up for exploited human workers, help address a human health holocaust, work to reduce the profits and control of the 1%, surrender the hierarchical privilege of speciesism, and do your part to defend the eco-system before it’s too late?
What if I added that this choice also addresses deforestation, topsoil depletion, overfishing, water pollution, rapid species extinction, the proliferation of GMOs in our food supply, and so much more?
What if I then informed you that you could do all this 24 hours a day and still have plenty of time for many other forms of protest and dissent?
As an activist -- a revolutionary, even -- I’d imagine you’d be practically drooling. Right?
Unfortunately, for way too many of you, the only thing you drool for is… (wait for it) bacon. You know who you are. You think pizza is dreamy, vegans are annoying, and you diligently delude yourself with tall tales of being “too busy helping humans” to care about animals.
In other words, in your eyes: Another world is possible… except at mealtime.
For those of you dwelling in such deadly denial, I offer a few examples of the hypocrisy on your plate:
If you call yourself a human rights activist, I’d urge you to examine how your food choices detrimentally impact the working class you claim you want to help. Inside the slaughterhouses, for example, the animals are not the only ones suffering. The meat industry, along with its low wages, long hours, and dehumanizing work, has the highest job-related injury rate and by far the highest rate of serious injury -- and at least half the workers are women.
GoVeg.com adds: "According to the U.S. Department of Labor, nearly one in three slaughterhouse workers suffers from illness or injury, compared to one in 10 workers in other manufacturing jobs. Slaughterhouse workers are also 35 times more likely to suffer from repetitive stress injuries than their counterparts in other manufacturing jobs."
Of course, with many undocumented immigrants and poor Americans working such jobs, it remains unknown how many injuries go unreported.
Whether you call it a cage, a cell, a jail, a pen, a ward, a prison, a wildlife center, or an enclosure… incarceration is incarceration. A culture that confines and abuses animals for profit is highly likely to regularly promote and engage in other forms of violence and exploitation.
Here’s a little of what most of us regularly omit when thinking about zoos:
- Zoos are mostly focused on "cute babies" and ultimately create unwanted animals.
- They can reduce genetic diversity and do not contribute to increasing robust animal populations in the wild.
- They do little to nothing to seriously address the underlying causes of habitat loss and thereby let the perpetrators off the hook.
- Warehousing endangered species sends the frightening subliminal message that it's acceptable to spend money to view animals in enclosures while, for example, forests are being clear cut to make way for doomed livestock -- depriving many of those same animals the freedom to live in their own habitats.
- Animals are obviously not meant to live in captivity and, as a result, often display stress and/or psychological dysfunction, and, just as often, these animals are abused.
- Encountering animals in a zoo setting teaches the wrong lessons about how our eco-systems work. Wrong lessons only serve to sustain a system that should be dismantled.
- Captive breeding can create a false sense that the battle to save endangered species and habitats is being won.
Whenever someone uses the word “slavery,” it almost automatically conjures up images of the African slave trade, the Middle Passage, and plantations in the American South.
However, slavery is currently the world’s fastest growing criminal industry -- a multi-billion dollar global enterprise with estimates as high as 27 million modern-day human slaves. This includes sex trafficking, debt slavery, forced labor, and much more.
In other words, the word and the concept of slavery are not and have never been exclusively reserved for African-Americans.
In fact, the word and the concept of slavery should not and should never be exclusively reserved for humans. For example:
- When a horse is locked into a small stable and only taken out when forced to pull a human-filled carriage through Central Park in order to procure income for its owner (sic), by any sane definition, that’s a form of slave labor.
- When a female dog is confined in a cage at a puppy mill and forced to produce litter after litter of puppies to be sold for the financial gain of her owner (sic), undeniably, it’s a form of slavery.
To declare that these examples (and far too many more to detail here) do not constitute slavery is to betray one’s speciesist bias and expose a glaring compassion blind spot.
Modern human debt slaves in Asia endure a vastly different experience than, say, African slaves on a plantation in 1825. To acknowledge this reality doesn’t make either oppressed human more or less of a slave.
Similarly, to call an animal a “slave” is not to imply that the animal’s experience is indistinguishable from that of a human slave. It is to simply acknowledge that a sentient creature is being confined and abused in the name of someone else’s profit.
Occupying Wall Street means much more than creating clever memes about Goldman Sachs. The global animal agribusiness is a supremely powerful entity within the corridors of power. That’s precisely why this earth-killing industry is salivating over “free trade” agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that allow them to pressure countries to eliminate import safety standards and eliminate tariffs on U.S. meat, dairy, and egg exports.
Among many other nightmares, this means: More animals suffering on factory farms, more climate change and factory farm pollution, more destruction of rainforests for livestock feed, more diabetes, heart disease, and cancer in the global South, and more outbreaks of deadly diseases like bird flu and swine flu, and dig this: it means more countries shifting to factory farming in order to stay competitive, which means game over for the eco-system.
All across the planet -- 24 hours a day -- “artificial insemination” is the norm for the dairy industry. Here’s how the folks at HumaneMyth.org explain it:
“All forms of dairy farming involve forcibly impregnating cows. This involves a person inserting his arm far into the cow’s rectum in order to position the uterus, and then forcing an instrument into her vagina. The restraining apparatus used is commonly called a ‘rape rack’.”
Despite all this (and so much more), when the word “rape” is used to define such practices, it is often met with indignation by those claiming this word is the sole domain of humans -- non-male humans, almost exclusively.
But if we can all agree that, say, the rape of a man in prison is not identical to the far more prevalent rape of women (or any non cis male), why should the use of this word remain off limits to the unique circumstances of, say, a giant panda or dairy cows?
To use the word “rape” when discussing the forced insemination of a non-human does not invalidate or downplay the horrific trauma of human rape. To declare otherwise is to betray one’s speciesist bias and expose a glaring compassion blind spot.
There are so many ways our speciesist culture intersects with Monsanto -- far more than I could detail here -- but for now, please consider this: 65 percent of grains -- the vast majority of which is GM -- are fed to the 53 billion land animals murdered for “food” each year by an industry that is systematically destroying our landbase. FYI: These animal “food” products are also not labeled as genetically modified.
What does your beloved burger have to do with being an environmentalist, you ask? Let’s begin with this: The number one source of human-created greenhouse gases (read: climate change) is the global animal by-products industry -- factory farming, the meat-and-dairy-based diet.
- We lose nearly 7 billion tons of topsoil every year and 75 percent of the original U.S. topsoil is already gone. Without nutrient-rich topsoil, human life will vanish and guess what’s causing 85 percent of this topsoil erosion: livestock raising and feedcrops.
- 200,000 acres rainforest are destroyed every single day and 70 percent of previous forested land in the Amazon is now pastures or feedcrops for doomed livestock. Every time you eat a burger sourced from the rainforest, you are responsible for 700 pounds of living matter being destroyed: 20-30 plant species; 100 insect species; and of dozens reptiles, birds, and mammals.
- The land used to raise animals for “food” is 10 billion acres. Livestock production consumes 70 percent of all agricultural land, which translates into one-third of the land surface on the planet.
Let’s re-cap: Each year, 65 percent of untested GM grains are fed to 53 billion doomed land animals in an industry that eats up one-third of the land surface on the planet and is the number one source of human-created greenhouse gases but somehow you’re a meat-eating “environmentalist”?
Angela Davis, someone who knows a little about challenging privilege, has declared that being a vegan is “part of a revolutionary perspective -- how we not only discover more compassionate relations with human beings but how we develop compassionate relations with the other creatures with whom we share this planet.”
In the narration of the essential film, Earthlings, we’re told:
“By analogy with racism and sexism, the term ‘speciesism’ is a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one’s own species and against those of members of other species … Like us, (animals) are the psychological centers of a life that is uniquely their own. What these animals are due from us, how we morally ought to treat them, are questions whose answer begins with the recognition of our psychological kinship with them.”
If you claim to be working towards a non-hierarchical society, reject speciesism.
If you work to challenge privilege in all its many guises (e.g. patriarchy, homophobia, sexism, racism, able-ism, ageism, hetero-normalcy, classism, trans-phobia, etc.), reject speciesism.
If you call yourself an activist, reject speciesism.
If you have a shred of compassion in your heart, stop with the fuckin’ bacon jokes and reject speciesism.
You can’t have it both ways, comrades, and the time is long overdue to decide: Which side are you on?
All of our grievances -- and our solutions -- are connected…
Mickey Z. is the author of 11 books, most recently the novel Darker Shade of Green. Until the laws are changed or the power runs out, he can be found on an obscure website called Facebook. Anyone wishing to support his activist efforts can do so by making a donation here.
© WorldNewsTrust.com -- Share and re-post this story. Please include this copyright notice and a link to World News Trust.